[Bonetools] Mammoth tusk as raw material in Roman times?

François Poplin poplin at mnhn.fr
Thu Apr 18 09:44:42 CEST 2013


Le 18/04/2013 00:35, Sonja Vukovic a écrit :
> Dear all,
>
> thank you for the responses.. As Selena told you, it was found within 
> the secure context and there is no doubt in it. As for the 
> identification, I am not versed in it, but I am sure that it was 
> identified professionaly. I will ask Sofija about the photos, but as 
> it will be published soon, we can forward you the paper..
>
> But no one answered our original question: *Has** anyone ever 
> identified a mammoth tusk as raw material in Roman period*?
I shall come back to this matter in a couple of days. And I observe too 
that nobody answered my remark/question :*there is a mighty, excellent 
way to know. Who can tell?
*
Sincerely.


>
> Thank you,
> greetings from Belgrade,
>
> Sonja
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:36 PM, S O'Connor <S.Oconnor at bradford.ac.uk 
> <mailto:S.Oconnor at bradford.ac.uk>> wrote:
>
>     That is the other Banerjee paper I was asking about.  If anyone
>     has got them I would be really grateful for a copy............
>
>     Sonia
>
>     Dr Sonia O'Connor PhD FSA FIIC ACR Honorary Visiting Fellow,
>     University of York
>     Post-doctoral Research Fellow
>     Archaeological Sciences
>     Division of AGES,
>     University of Bradford
>     Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP, UK
>
>     tel 01274 23 6498 <tel:01274%2023%206498> (office) 5210 (lab)
>     fax 01274 23 5210 <tel:01274%2023%205210>
>
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: bonetools-bounces at listserv.niif.hu
>     <mailto:bonetools-bounces at listserv.niif.hu>
>     [mailto:bonetools-bounces at listserv.niif.hu
>     <mailto:bonetools-bounces at listserv.niif.hu>] On Behalf Of
>     trzaska at lineone.net <mailto:trzaska at lineone.net>
>     Sent: 17 April 2013 13:15
>     To: bonetools at listserv.niif.hu <mailto:bonetools at listserv.niif.hu>
>     Subject: Re: [Bonetools] Mammoth tusk as raw material in Roman times?
>
>     This would need to be checked but I think I am right in believing
>     that a merovingian object from Frankfurt Dom was also thought to
>     be mammoth ivory:
>
>     Hampel, A. and Bannerjee, A., 1995
>     Identifizierung und Differenzierung von Elfenbein am Bespiel des
>     merowingerzeitlichen Grabfundes aus dem Frankfurter Dom,
>     Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 25, 143-7
>
>
>
>     >From a secure context as well I think, but is it mammoth ?
>
>
>
>     Ian Riddler
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     >----Original Message----
>
>     >From: selenavitezovic at gmail.com <mailto:selenavitezovic at gmail.com>
>
>     >Date: 17/04/2013 12:42
>
>     >To: "Mailing list for archaeologists of the research group for
>     the study of
>
>     >       object and waste of bone,
>
>     >       antler. ivory and horn."<bonetools at listserv.niif.hu
>     <mailto:bonetools at listserv.niif.hu>>
>
>     >Subj: Re: [Bonetools] Mammoth tusk as raw material in Roman times?
>
>     >
>
>     >Hello, everyone,
>
>     >
>
>     >The item is from the secured context, it was discovered during the
>
>     >excavations conducted by Sofija Petkovic' herself.
>
>     >As to the photos, it must be checked with Sofija first.
>
>     >L'objet était trouvé pendant les fouilles qui était menée par Sofija
>
>     >Petkovic'. Il faut verifié avec Sofija pour les photos.
>
>     >
>
>     >best regards, Selena
>
>     >
>
>     >
>
>     >On 17 April 2013 12:31, S O'Connor <S.Oconnor at bradford.ac.uk
>     <mailto:S.Oconnor at bradford.ac.uk>> wrote:
>
>     >
>
>     >> Dear Sonja,
>
>     >>
>
>     >> As François says, it would be useful to know the context for
>     the object. Is
>
>     >> it possible for us to see some photographs of the fragment?
>
>     >>
>
>     >> Thanks,
>
>     >>
>
>     >> Sonia
>
>     >>
>
>     >> Dr Sonia O'Connor PhD FSA FIIC ACR Honorary Visiting Fellow,
>     University of
>
>     >> York
>
>     >> Post-doctoral Research Fellow
>
>     >> Archaeological Sciences
>
>     >> Division of AGES,
>
>     >> University of Bradford
>
>     >> Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP, UK
>
>     >>
>
>     >> tel 01274 23 6498 <tel:01274%2023%206498> (office) 5210 (lab)
>
>     >> fax 01274 23 5210 <tel:01274%2023%205210>
>
>     >>
>
>     >>
>
>     >> -----Original Message-----
>
>     >> From: bonetools-bounces at listserv.niif.hu
>     <mailto:bonetools-bounces at listserv.niif.hu>
>
>     >> [mailto:bonetools-bounces at listserv.niif.hu
>     <mailto:bonetools-bounces at listserv.niif.hu>] On Behalf Of François
>     Poplin
>
>     >> Sent: 17 April 2013 09:11
>
>     >> To: bonetools at listserv.niif.hu <mailto:bonetools at listserv.niif.hu>
>
>     >> Subject: Re: [Bonetools] Mammoth tusk as raw material in Roman
>     times?
>
>     >>
>
>     >> Dear SA O'Connor
>
>     >>
>
>     >> 1°) I am affraid, but the fact that has not been answered my
>     question "Has
>
>     >> it been found in a genuine and secure archaelogical excavation ?"
>
>     >> sounds bad,
>
>     >>
>
>     >> 2°) in that very case, there is a mighty, excellent way to
>     know. Who can
>
>     >> tell ? (Olivier please, keep quite for some days).
>
>     >>
>
>     >> Your's.
>
>     >>
>
>     >> Le 16/04/2013 14:32, SA O'Connor a écrit :
>
>     >> > Dear Sonja,
>
>     >> >
>
>     >> > I would be really interested in knowing the basis of this
>
>     >> > identification. If this is based on Schreger angle
>     measurements, it
>
>     >> > may not be possible to differentiate mammoth from extant
>     elephant with
>
>     >> > any confidence from a fragment.
>
>     >> >
>
>     >> > Only the outer Schreger angles are diagnostic, i.e. those in the
>
>     >> > outermost layers of the dentine, close to the cementum
>     covering of the
>
>     >> > tusk. Towards the centre of a tusk the angles become
>     progressively
>
>     >> > smaller and similar in character whether the tusk is from an
>     extant
>
>     >> > and extinct proboscidean species. So, even if the Schreger angles
>
>     >> > average less than 100 or even 90 degrees, unless traces of the
>
>     >> > cementum are visible the fragment might come from any
>     position in the
>
>     >> > tusk and could be elephant or mammoth.
>
>     >> >
>
>     >> > All the best,
>
>     >> >
>
>     >> > Sonia
>
>     >> >
>
>     >> >
>
>     >> > kQuoting Sonja Vukovic <sonja.vukovic at gmail.com
>     <mailto:sonja.vukovic at gmail.com>>:
>
>     >> >
>
>     >> >> Dear colleagues,
>
>     >> >>
>
>     >> >> I am forwarding you a query from our colleague, Dr Sofija
>     Petkovic
>
>     >> >> from the Institute of Archaeology in Belgrade. She is
>     analysing an
>
>     >> >> object made of the mammoth tusk, found in Romuliana
>     (Serbia), that
>
>     >> >> dates back to the Roman period. The object is fragmented and it
>
>     >> >> represents an elephant's head done in a relief. The function
>     of this
>
>     >> >> item is unclear, but it was probably an application for some
>     kind of
>
>     >> >> furniture or sarcophagi, etc..
>
>     >> >>
>
>     >> >> She is wondering weather anyone has ever identified a
>     mammoth tusk as
>
>     >> >> raw material in Roman period?!
>
>     >> >>
>
>     >> >> Anyway, she is going to publish this object soon!
>
>     >> >>
>
>     >> >> Thank you very much,
>
>     >> >> best wishes,
>
>     >> >>
>
>     >> >> Sonja
>
>     >> >>
>
>     >> >> --
>
>     >> >> Sonja Vukovic
>
>     >> >> Laboratory for bioarchaeology
>
>     >> >> Faculty of Philosophy
>
>     >> >> University of Belgrade
>
>     >> >> Serbia
>
>     >> >>
>
>     >> >
>
>     >> >
>
>     >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     >> > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>
>     >> >
>
>     >> >
>
>     >> >
>
>     >> > _______________________________________________
>
>     >> > Bonetools mailing list
>
>     >> > Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu <mailto:Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu>
>
>     >> > https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools
>     >> >
>
>     >> >
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> --
>     >> François POPLIN
>     >>
>     >> Directeur honoraire de l'UMR 7209 Archéozoologie, Archébotanique :
>     >> sociétés,
>     >> pratiques et environnements
>     >>
>     >> Responsable du Séminaire d'Anthropozoologie
>     >>
>     >> Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle
>     >> CP 56
>     >> Ancien Laboratoire d'Anatomie comparée
>     >> 55, rue de Buffon
>     >> 75005 Paris
>     >> 01 40 79 33 11
>     >> fax ------ 33 14
>     >>
>     >> francoispoplin.blogspot.com <http://francoispoplin.blogspot.com>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> Bonetools mailing list
>     >> Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu <mailto:Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu>
>     >> https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools
>     >>
>
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> Bonetools mailing list
>     >> Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu <mailto:Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu>
>     >> https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools
>     >>
>
>     >_______________________________________________
>     >Bonetools mailing list
>     >Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu <mailto:Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu>
>     >https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools
>     >
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Bonetools mailing list
>     Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu <mailto:Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu>
>     https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Bonetools mailing list
>     Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu <mailto:Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu>
>     https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Sonja Vukovic
> Laboratory for bioarchaeology
> Faculty of Philosophy
> University of Belgrade
> Serbia
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bonetools mailing list
> Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu
> https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools


-- 
François POPLIN

Directeur honoraire de l'UMR 7209 Archéozoologie, Archébotanique : sociétés, pratiques et environnements

Responsable du Séminaire d'Anthropozoologie

Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle
CP 56
Ancien Laboratoire d'Anatomie comparée
55, rue de Buffon
75005 Paris
01 40 79 33 11
fax ------ 33 14

francoispoplin.blogspot.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://listserv.niif.hu/pipermail/bonetools/attachments/20130418/2559b81f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Bonetools mailing list