[Bonetools] FW: Bone object - textile manufacture?

SA O'Connor S.Oconnor at bradford.ac.uk
Tue Mar 5 19:31:58 CET 2013


Thanks you Etan.  I have passed this on to Erik.  It will be  
interesting to see what other information he can come up with.


All the best,

Sonia

Quoting Etan Ayalon <etana at eretzmuseum.org.il>:

> Dear all,
>
> Perhaps the object was what we call "belt divider" (which could also  
> used to divide other groups of thin leather stripes or threads), or  
> a weaving tablet? Cf.:
>
> Ayalon, E. 2005. The Assemblage of Bone and Ivory Artifacts from  
> Caesarea Maritima, Israel 1st-13th Centuries CE (BAR IS 1457).  
> Oxford:30, No. 89, Fig. 8:89.
>
> Etan
>
>
>
> From: bonetools-bounces at listserv.niif.hu  
> [mailto:bonetools-bounces at listserv.niif.hu] On Behalf Of S O'Connor
> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 2:19 PM
> To: 'Mailing list for archaeologists of the research group for the  
> study ofobject and waste of bone,antler. ivory and horn.'
> Subject: Re: [Bonetools] FW: Bone object - textile manufacture?
>
>
>
> Dear Etan, Boris and Maja,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your comments I will pass your comments on to Erik.  I  
> have not seen the object myself.
>
>
>
> All the best,
>
>
>
> Sonia
>
>
>
> Dr Sonia O'Connor PhD FSA FIIC ACR Honorary Visiting Fellow,  
> University of York
>
> Post-doctoral Research Fellow
>
> Archaeological Sciences
>
> Division of AGES,
>
> University of Bradford
>
> Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP, UK
>
>
>
> tel 01274 23 6498 (office) 5210 (lab)
>
> fax 01274 23 5210
>
>
>
> From: bonetools-bounces at listserv.niif.hu  
> [mailto:bonetools-bounces at listserv.niif.hu] On Behalf Of Etan Ayalon
> Sent: 04 March 2013 11:23
> To: Mailing list for archaeologists of the research group for  
> thestudy of object and waste of bone, antler. ivory and horn.
> Subject: Re: [Bonetools] FW: Bone object - textile manufacture?
>
>
>
> By the way, on October 30, 2012 Putelat Oliviers sent a mail about a  
> piece of bone with a rather similar row of holes, found in an Iron  
> Age salt works in Lorrain, France. You, Sonia, had a suggestion for  
> its use.
>
> Etan
>
>
>
> From: bonetools-bounces at listserv.niif.hu  
> [mailto:bonetools-bounces at listserv.niif.hu] On Behalf Of S O'Connor
> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 12:31 PM
> To: 'Mailing list for archaeologists of the research group for the  
> study ofobject and waste of bone,antler. ivory and horn.'
> Subject: Re: [Bonetools] FW: Bone object - textile manufacture?
>
>
>
> I will ask Erik if he can be any more precise about the date.
>
>
>
> Sonia
>
>
>
> Dr Sonia O'Connor PhD FSA FIIC ACR Honorary Visiting Fellow,  
> University of York
>
> Post-doctoral Research Fellow
>
> Archaeological Sciences
>
> Division of AGES,
>
> University of Bradford
>
> Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP, UK
>
>
>
> tel 01274 23 6498 (office) 5210 (lab)
>
> fax 01274 23 5210
>
>
>
> From: bonetools-bounces at listserv.niif.hu  
> [mailto:bonetools-bounces at listserv.niif.hu] On Behalf Of Etan Ayalon
> Sent: 03 March 2013 06:22
> To: Mailing list for archaeologists of the research group for  
> thestudy of object and waste of bone, antler. ivory and horn.
> Subject: Re: [Bonetools] FW: Bone object - textile manufacture?
>
>
>
> What is the date of this object?
>
> Etan
>
>
>
> From: bonetools-bounces at listserv.niif.hu  
> [mailto:bonetools-bounces at listserv.niif.hu] On Behalf Of Selena  
> Vitezovic
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 6:50 PM
> To: Mailing list for archaeologists of the research group for the  
> study ofobject and waste of bone,antler. ivory and horn.
> Subject: Re: [Bonetools] FW: Bone object - textile manufacture?
>
>
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> There is a paper from M. Meneses Fernandez on similar objects  
> (although from Neolithic), with experimental results, in the volume  
> "Trace et fonction: les gestes retrouvés", eds. P. Anderson, S.  
> Beyries, M. Otte and H, Plisson.
>
> best regards, Selena
>
> On 1 March 2013 17:45, S O'Connor <S.Oconnor at bradford.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Thank you for these observations François, I will pass them on to Erik.
>
>
>
> All the best,
>
>
>
> Sonia
>
>
>
> Dr Sonia O'Connor PhD FSA FIIC ACR Honorary Visiting Fellow,  
> University of York
>
> Post-doctoral Research Fellow
>
> Archaeological Sciences
>
> Division of AGES,
>
> University of Bradford
>
> Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP, UK
>
>
>
> tel 01274 23 6498 (office) 5210 (lab)
>
> fax 01274 23 5210
>
>
>
> From: bonetools-bounces at listserv.niif.hu  
> [mailto:bonetools-bounces at listserv.niif.hu] On Behalf Of François  
> Poplin
> Sent: 01 March 2013 14:33
> To: bonetools at listserv.niif.hu
> Subject: Re: [Bonetools] FW: Bone object - textile manufacture?
>
>
>
> Indeed, the worn of the "entire broken" end is more moticeable than  
> the wear of the "last" (complete) hole (it's clear that another, a  
> "more last" hole was there, and necessarily - the thing won't break  
> between to holes). The wear of the inter-hole may be due to a  
> leather strap/band rather than to a thread, for the worn spreads  
> widely in the hole (and not causing an ogival bay). That makes me  
> think of an attachment for hanging the piece or, rather, for  
> attaching something to it, as in a "porte clés". Again, the whole  
> worn of that end is the more important thing; maybe was the break  
> rasped first in orther to make it "flat", to get rid of the  
> irregularity.
>
> the repeated drill-holes (made with the same drill, I suppose) did  
> not receive moving thread, string, as they show no worn - but, for  
> the same rason, they coud have received firm bars of wood, for  
> instance, as in a ladder. I don't dare to thing that this was just  
> an exercise of drilling... : after the break, maybe, not before; and  
> the hole are too regurlarly distrbuited (in line and in equidistance)
>
> Inbetween, the clok has run.. I have to stop.
>
> Your's.
>
> Le 01/03/2013 13:37, S O'Connor a écrit :
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> I am forwarding on this enquiry from a student at the University of  
> Durham.  I have objects like this, but not so thick, in wood and  
> plastic on which I store my different coloured threads when I am  
> working on an embroidery project.  However the pattern of wear does  
> not really support this use.  Perhaps the wear and polish at the  
> broken end suggests a reuse of something originally made for an  
> entirely different purpose.  If you have any suggestions or  
> parallels, please let me know and I will forward them on to Erik.
>
>
>
> All the best,
>
>
>
> Sonia
>
> Dr Sonia O'Connor PhD FSA FIIC ACR Honorary Visiting Fellow,  
> University of York
>
> Post-doctoral Research Fellow
>
> Archaeological Sciences
>
> Division of AGES,
>
> University of Bradford
>
> Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP, UK
>
>
>
> tel 01274 23 6498 (office) 5210 (lab)
>
> fax 01274 23 5210
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Dr. O'Connor,
>
> My name is Erik Farrell; I am a student in the MA Artefact  
> Conservation programme at Durham university, and am currently  
> working on identifying a bone object for the Durham Oriental Museum.  
> I suspect it to be either a tool associated with textile  
> manufacture, or potentially an oddly shaped spacer bead, but because  
> of the poor survival rate of textile tools am having a difficult  
> time finding any comparable examples. I contacted Dr. Mary Brooks  
> here at Durham, and she recommended I contact you as someone with  
> expertise in both bone artefacts and textiles.
>
> The object is made of bone; I am working on getting a species  
> identification, but have managed to rule out ivory. It is from  
> Egypt, but it is from an older collection, so I do not yet have a  
> date range or cultural period.
>
> You can see in the photos that the broken end is tapered on the  
> surviving piece, and looks like it would have come to a point or a  
> rounded point. There are holes along the entire length, but only the  
> hole at the complete end shows wear; it looks like it has been worn  
> by a thread passing through the hole, wrapped around the back end of  
> the object. It is this wear pattern that makes me think textile  
> manufacture may be an option. I don't really know what to make of  
> the lack of comparable wear in the other holes.
>
> I have attached the artefact photos and a scan of the archaeological  
> drawing to this email. I am hoping your background and knowledge of  
> bone objects and textile production may give some insight on  
> potential uses for this object. I have also included a couple photos  
> of breaks under the microscope on the chance that you might be able  
> to give some insight into what sort of bone this is, but I know that  
> sort of identification is usually done with the object in hand. Any  
> information you can give me - even if it is just speculation on  
> potential uses for a tool of this size and shape - would be greatly  
> appreciated.
>
> Thank you very much,
>
> Erik Farrell
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bonetools mailing list
> Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu
> https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools
>
>
>
> --
> François POPLIN
>
> Directeur honoraire de l'UMR 7209 Archéozoologie, Archébotanique :  
> sociétés, pratiques et environnements
>
> Responsable du Séminaire d'Anthropozoologie
>
> Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle
> CP 56
> Ancien Laboratoire d'Anatomie comparée
> 55, rue de Buffon
> 75005 Paris
> 01 40 79 33 11
> fax ------ 33 14
>
> francoispoplin.blogspot.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bonetools mailing list
> Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu
> https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.





More information about the Bonetools mailing list