[Bonetools] Colouring bone
Dave Constantine
dkconstantine at btinternet.com
Thu Apr 17 14:56:13 CEST 2014
Dear Sonia and Vincent,
Thank you for your replies.
I have successfully produced a reasonable quantity of verdigris myself for staining experiments, using the method you described Vincent, but I haven’t tried it with urine yet. Did you try dyeing any material when you produced it, or was the production of verdigris alone the experiment?
So the rivets in this comb (http://balat.kikirpa.be/photo.php?path=X035781&objnr=20052916) were bronze? I had thought iron from the brown around them, and presumed it was ferrous staining.
Regards,
David Constantine
From: Vincent Cattersel
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 1:36 PM
To: Mailing list for archaeologists of the research group for the study of object and waste of bone, antler. ivory and horn.
Subject: Re: [Bonetools] Colouring bone
Dear David and Sonia,
the rivets were bronze so the green colouration could well be coming from the rivets' oxidation. However this staining was limited to the surface (surface of the cortical bone) and not in sub-surface layers. Therefore we assume that the colouration was done deliberately.
Based on our data, a relationship with a certain recipe wasn't possible but we think it was a copper based product (so called verdigris, basic copper acetate, Cu(OH)2 · (CH3COO)2 · 5 H2O).
You also mention the use of urine, which was frequently used for producing metal salt based pigments. The urine itself induces the corrosion on the copper sample. After it is corroded, one can scratch of the crystals, grind them to the desired particle size, add a medium (e.g. oil, wax) et voilà, a green pigment. See these two pictures from an experiment I have done in 2003.
On the first picture you can see small slabs of copper hanging above vinegar (I could have well replaced the vinegar with urine). There should be no contact between the copper slabs and the fluid. The vapours of the fluid induces the corrosion process. On the second picture you can see the actual scrapings of the copper acetate crystals, which are ready to use. One often read in historical recipes that the jar should be buried in horse dong. The bacterial activity in the latter produces heat (sometimes +70° Celcius) and therefore it significantly increases the corrosion process and reduces the production time.
Sonia:
the object you have mailed also has the same green colouration as I would expect from an object coloured with a basic copper acetate based pigment. What draws my attention is the brownish decolouration on both sides of that object. Copper acetate is quite unstable and when exposed to light and a 'high degree of humidity' it turns into the more stable molecule copper oxide, which is brown to black.
Yours,
Vincent Cattersel
On 17 April 2014 13:36, SA O'Connor <S.Oconnor at bradford.ac.uk> wrote:
Dear David,
Back in the 1980s, when I was at the York Archaeological Trust we were involved in providing green stained objects for an undergraduate dissertation by a University of Bradford, Archaeological Sciences, student (surname of Edwards, I think) to look at exactly this question. Some objects seemed to be accidentally stained (often very patchy) whilst others were intensely and evenly stained and were considered to be deliberately coloured. All were analysed by XRF and copper/bronze proved to be the basis of all the staining solutions used.
In my more recent work I have documented historical pieces, such selected elements of bone and antler in box and gun inlays and bone and ivory cutlery handles(and working waste from cutlers) that are undeniably deliberately stained.
I attach a low resolution image an archaeological example, a buckle at the Yorkshire Museum that I am convinced is deliberately stained in this way.
All the best,
Sonia
Quoting David Constantine <dkconstantine at btinternet.com>:
I am aware that copper (or alloys) is often cited as a green dye for (such as in MacGregor 1985), but I believe there is also recipes from the Mappae Clavicula that use weld, urine and "lulax" to dye bone green, so I was curious to see if any chemical analysis has been performed to determine how the green has been achieved.
Looking at the zoomed images, I believe the rivets are iron.
Regards,
David Constantine
________________________________
From: Kordula Gostencnik <kgosten at gmail.com>
To: "Mailing list for archaeologists of the research group for the study of object and waste of bone, antler. ivory and horn." <bonetools at listserv.niif.hu>
Sent: Wednesday, 16 April 2014, 20:21
Subject: Re: [Bonetools] Colouring bone
Green stains are normally caused by bronze objects or copper alloy scrap associated with worked bones in the soil. Are the rivets all made from iron or also from bronze?
Kordula
2014-04-16 17:15 GMT+02:00 Dave Constantine <dkconstantine at btinternet.com>:
Thank you all for your replies.
Vincent, the green stained comb you linked is rather interesting. Do you
know what the green pigment is? Also, looking at the images, it seems that it is
no more than a surface colourant with little penetration, is this correct?
Thank you for your suggestion of minium, I was at a loss about what it
could be. It is not a fresh find, it was originally discovered in the 1960s (or
possibly 1970s) and mounted on a card for display. To the best of my knowledge
though, the colouring is original, though it is possible that the surface was
also coloured and this has simply failed to survive.
I have Arthur MacGregor’s book, and very useful it is too on the matter of
colouring.
Regards,
David Constantine
From: Vincent Cattersel
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 2:03 PM
To: Mailing list for archaeologists of the
research group for the study of object and waste of bone, antler. ivory and
horn.
Subject: Re: [Bonetools] Colouring bone
Dear all,
this is a first where I might be able to contribute to this group, but I'm
happy to do so:
In 2008 I have conserved and restored 8 bone/antler combs from the
Merovingian period at the Royal Institute for Cultural Heritage (Brussels,
Belgium). These combs are currently preserved at the Royal Museums of Art and
History in Brussels, Belgium.
Here you can find pictures of a few of them (click on the pictures to get a
zoomable high resolution image):
http://balat.kikirpa.be/photo.php?path=X026849&objnr=20042741
http://balat.kikirpa.be/photo.php?path=X035781&objnr=20052916
(green staining on the surface, carbon black in the circular
motives)
http://balat.kikirpa.be/photo.php?path=X026845&objnr=20052917
http://balat.kikirpa.be/photo.php?path=X038388&objnr=20052919
http://balat.kikirpa.be/photo.php?path=X035783&objnr=20052922
Some of these where coloured and stained with green and carbon black. We
used µ-XRF, µ-RAMAN and SEM(-EDX) to analyse the stains and the carbon black
particles.
So staining and colouring isn't that uncommon, as you probably already
know.
When I look at the picture, I can see that the red is slightly orange,
which makes me think about the pigment lead red (also called 'minium' or lead
tetra-oxide, Pb3O4). This isn't a
surprise since it is one of the oldest known vivid red pigments (except for some
iron oxide pigments derived from hematite and red earth or cinnabar (HgS),
however they all are true 'reddish' in colour and lack the hint of orange).
Some simple identification techniques for minium are:
* Ultraviolet fluorescence (if minium, it minium it should show a dark red colouration);
* Infrared False Color which should gives the observed minium a yellow-brown colour. Analytical techniques:
In case you have the oppurtunity to
analyse it with RAMAN, you can find a reference spectrum here.
For
a reference spectrum of minium using XRF: here.
Another thing is the question whether this die was excavated and brought
directly to your collection or was it once part of a (private)collection and
excavated a long time ago.
This is an important question since it could provide an answer to whether
or not this colouration is original.
I know from my experiences with the conservation of precious ivory objects
that they are often repainted (repolychromed) throughout time, even though their
iconography or typology gives us reasons to believe that they originally weren't
polychromed or not polychromed in such manner as they are today.
To get back on the minium pigment, more information can be found in:
* Eastaugh, N., Walsh, V., Chaplin, T., & Siddall, R. (2008). Pigment Compendium - A Dictionary and Optical Microscopy of Historical Pigments. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
* Feller, R. L., Gettens, R. J., & Chase, W. T. (1993). Vermilion and Cinnabar. In R. Ashok, Artists' Pigments - A Handbook of Their History and Characteristics. (Vol. II, pp. 159-182). Washington-London: National Gallery of Art.
Another book I can recommend on staining and colouring bone materials is:
McGregor. A. (1985) Bone, Antler, Ivory & Horn: The Technology of Skeletal
Materials Since the Roman Period.
I don't have it here with me for the moment, but as you wish, I can always
go through it to find more information on red staining or colouring.
Yours,
Vincent Cattersel
Drs.
VINCENT CATTERSEL
Doctoral researcher
Universiteit
Antwerpen / University of Antwerp
Faculteit
Ontwerpwetenschappen / Faculty of Design Sciences
Opleiding
conservatie-restauratie / Conservation Studies
Blindestraat
9
B-2000
Antwerpen
T +32 3 213 71
34 | F +32 3 213 71 35
vincent.cattersel at uantwerpen.be
www.uantwerpen.be
On 15 April 2014 09:06, David Constantine <dkconstantine at btinternet.com> wrote:
Hello All,
Attached is an image of a (probably) Saxon bone/antler die. As can be seen, there is reddish pigmentation in the decoration. I have looked around for similar colouring and with the exception of a "lucet" from London I cannot seem to find anything similar, just totally stained objects e.g. the belt buckle from York. Does anyone here know of any Early Medieval dated bone artefacts that are either entirely stained/dyed or have coloured decoration such as this?
Regards,
David
Constantine
_______________________________________________
Bonetools
mailing list
Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu
https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools
________________________________
_______________________________________________
Bonetools mailing
list
Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu
https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools
_______________________________________________
Bonetools mailing list
Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu
https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools
_______________________________________________
Bonetools mailing list
Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu
https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
_______________________________________________
Bonetools mailing list
Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu
https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bonetools mailing list
Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu
https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://listserv.niif.hu/pipermail/bonetools/attachments/20140417/723f0e0b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Copper slabs-vinegar.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 498316 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://listserv.niif.hu/pipermail/bonetools/attachments/20140417/723f0e0b/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: copper acetate.JPG
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 206068 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://listserv.niif.hu/pipermail/bonetools/attachments/20140417/723f0e0b/attachment-0001.jpe>
More information about the Bonetools
mailing list