[Bonetools] Re : Re : Bone tool debitage
Christian Gates St-Pierre
cgates70 at yahoo.fr
Mon Mar 26 14:22:52 CEST 2012
Bonjour Isabelle,
Thanks for the references. I will look for them in our libraries first and I will get back to you if have any problems to get them.
Bonne journée!
Christian
________________________________
De : SIDERA Isabelle <isabelle.sidera at mae.u-paris10.fr>
À : Christian Gates St-Pierre <cgates70 at yahoo.fr>; "Mailing list for archaeologists of the research group for the study of object and waste of bone, antler. ivory and horn." <bonetools at listserv.niif.hu>
Envoyé le : lundi 26 mars 2012 6h51
Objet : Re: [Bonetools] Re : Bone tool debitage
Cher Christian,
In the 80s, the criteria for identifying bone flaking techniques were discussed. This lead to defining a problematic around bone knapping. ETTOS, a french group of bone technology experimenters created by Danielle Stordeur, worked on the problem. They published a paper related to the efficiency of bone knapping and the degree of bone freshness (see below). This problematic was especially linked to Early Paleotlithic bone technology, see Biberson, Aguirre., Vincent and Patou-Matis (see below).
In the 70s, in the perspective of lithic technology, some scholars saw in bone flakes the sign of bone knapping work (see Roubet).
I do not see any recent work in the question. See may be Elise Tartar's work.
As Nerissa said : no hope or few for distinguising wether technological or food process.
Personnally when flakes are used as blanks and many long bone are broken, I tend to consider that there is a combination (telescopage) between technology and food process. Bones are broken with a certain savoir-faire for both aims. It is the case in Linear Pottery Culture (see Sidéra, 2000).
I can cite one example of obvious direct percussion only, which is made by an expert: see my paper in WNRG Talinn p. 88 fig. 9.
Some titles:
Biberson P., Aguirre E., 1965, Expériences de taille d'outils préhistoriques dans des os d'éléphant. Quaternaria, 7, p. 165-183.
ETTOS, 1985, Techniques de percussion appliquées au matériau osseux, premières expériences.Cahiers de l'Euphrate, 4, p. 373-381.
Vincent A., 1987, "Préliminaires expérimentaux du façonnage de l'os par percussion directe (quelques reproductions d'artefacts reconnus dans les niveaux du Paléolithique Moyen)".Outillage en os et en bois de cervidés I, Artefacts 1,éd. du Centre de recherche et de documentation archéologique de Viroinval,p. 23-32.
Roubet, C. 1979. Economie
pastorale préagricole en Algérie orientale. Le néolithique de tradition
capsien. Exemple de l’Aurès. CNRS, Paris.
Sadek-Kooros H., 1972, Primitive bone Fracturing. A Method of research.American Antiquity,37 (3),p. 369-382.
Sidéra I., 2000, Animaux domestiques, bêtes sauvages et objets en matières animales du Rubané au Michelsberg. De l'économie aux symboles, des techniques à la culture.Gallia Préhistoire, 42, p. 108-194.
I could make efforts to scan the papers if you do not find them.
Best, Isabelle
Le 23 mars 2012 à 22:38, Christian Gates St-Pierre a écrit :
That's right Nerissa, that's why I wonder if there's been any recent research regarding that specific problem, anything beyond the "spiral fracture dabate" for example, or beyond the "human vs animal taphonomic transformations". It may be easy to identify waste productions such as blanks or nearly finished objects that broke during manufacture, but distinguishing a flake or bone splinter resulting from food processing (you mention marrow and grease extraction) and a flake or bone splinter resulting from the first steps in the process of tool manufacture may not be that easy. So, would anyone know about any recent publication or research on that matter? Perhaps it's a bad idea to ask such a question on a Friday night... :-)
>
>
>
>Cheers!
>
>
>
>
>Christian Gates St-Pierre
>
>
>Chercheur invité
>Département d'anthropologie
>Université de Montréal
>
>
>Chercheur postdoctoral
>Département d'histoire
>Université Laval
>
>
>
>________________________________
> De : Nerissa Russell <nr29 at cornell.edu>
>À : "Mailing list for archaeologists of the research group for the study of object and waste of bone, antler. ivory and horn." <bonetools at listserv.niif.hu>
>Envoyé le : vendredi 23 mars 2012 15h18
>Objet : Re: [Bonetools] Bone tool debitage
>
>
>Really the bigger problem is distinguishing bone tool debitage from other anthropic fractures, such as marrow and bone grease processing.
>
>
>Nerissa Russell
>Associate Professor and Chair
>Department of Anthropology
>Cornell University
>Ithaca, NY 14853
>USA
>607-255-6790
>
>
>
>From: Christian Gates St-Pierre <cgates70 at yahoo.fr>
>Reply-To: Christian Gates St-Pierre <cgates70 at yahoo.fr>, "Mailing list for archaeologists of the research group for the study of object and waste of bone, antler. ivory and horn." <bonetools at listserv.niif.hu>
>Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:55:57 +0000
>To: "Mailing list for archaeologists of the research group for the study of object and waste of bone, antler. ivory and horn." <bonetools at listserv.niif.hu>
>Subject: [Bonetools] Bone tool debitage
>
>
>
>Hello,
>
>
>Would anyone know about any recent (post year 2000) publication on the differentiation between natural and anthropic fractures in order to identify the waste elements in the production of bone tools (flakes, debris, etc.), in English or French, and if possible from prehistoric contexts?
>
>
>Thank you in advance!
>
>
>
>
>Christian Gates St-Pierre
>
>
>Chercheur invité
>Département d'anthropologie
>Université de Montréal
>
>
>Chercheur postdoctoral
>Département d'histoire
>Université Laval
_______________________________________________ Bonetools mailing list Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools
>_______________________________________________
>Bonetools mailing list
>Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu
>https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Bonetools mailing list
>Bonetools at listserv.niif.hu
>https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools
>
Isabelle SIDERA (CNRS)
UMR 7055 - MSH René-Ginouvès
21 Allée de l'Université - 92 023 Nanterre cedex
tel. 1 46 69 24 48
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://listserv.niif.hu/pipermail/bonetools/attachments/20120326/399b9f52/attachment.html>
More information about the Bonetools
mailing list