<div dir="ltr">Dear Karin,<div><br></div><div>In the assemblage I've analysed for my MA thesis (technological and use-wear traces on bone and antler beads) I have some simple tube-shaped beads which could have been made of shafts of hares and/or rabbits.</div><div><br></div><div>These beads originate from a sepulchral context and date to the Early Bronze Age in Poland (the site has been radiocarbon dated: 2026-1746 BC).</div><div><br></div><div>Currently, I'm analysing a much bigger assemblage but from a similar context and I suspect that some of the bones are hare/rabbit bones. These are again tube-shaped beads and also something that looks like semi-products - only shafts with broken off epiphyses. I'm planning to do a DNA testing on some of the material, we've done that with 2 samples form the previous assemblage but it was inconclusive although the specialist suggested that there is a possibility that one of the beads could have been made of an <i>Oryctolagus cuniculus</i> bone (97% homology).</div><div><br></div><div>I hope this helps.</div><div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div>Kinga Winnicka</div><div>(University of Wroclaw, Poland)<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-02-24 22:02 GMT+01:00 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bonetools-request@listserv.niif.hu" target="_blank">bonetools-request@listserv.niif.hu</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">Send Bonetools mailing list submissions to<br>
<a href="mailto:bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools" target="_blank">https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:bonetools-request@listserv.niif.hu">bonetools-request@listserv.niif.hu</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
<a href="mailto:bonetools-owner@listserv.niif.hu">bonetools-owner@listserv.niif.hu</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of Bonetools digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. Re: WBRG Zhenzhou (Pam Crabtree)<br>
2. Re: Russian terminology (cobecker)<br>
3. Re: Lepus and Bone Tools (Nerissa Russell)<br>
4. Re: Lepus and Bone Tools (Griffitts, Janet L - (griffitt))<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 06:42:54 -0500<br>
From: "Pam Crabtree" <<a href="mailto:PamCDougC@comcast.net">PamCDougC@comcast.net</a>><br>
To: "Mailing list for archaeologists of the research group for the<br>
study of object and waste of bone, antler. ivory and horn."<br>
<<a href="mailto:bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [Bonetools] WBRG Zhenzhou<br>
Message-ID: <EADBF7FC4AAF4A17BDB539BA4C58AD40@PamPC><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8";<br>
reply-type=original<br>
<br>
Wonderful news and Happy New Year. Pam and Doug<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href="mailto:isabelle.sidera@mae.u-paris10.fr">isabelle.sidera@mae.u-paris10.fr</a><br>
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 4:17 AM<br>
To: Mailing list for archaeologists of the research group for the study of<br>
object and waste of bone, antler. ivory and horn.<br>
Subject: Re: [Bonetools] WBRG Zhenzhou<br>
<br>
Dear Xiaolin,<br>
<br>
Many thanks for these good news!<br>
Happy New Year!<br>
Best, Isabelle<br>
<br>
> Dear Isabelle and All,<br>
><br>
><br>
> The publication of the preceedings of Zhengzhou is in the final step and<br>
> will be published soon.<br>
> Once we get it, we will send the copies to the authors.<br>
> Thank you so much for your support!<br>
><br>
><br>
> With best wishes<br>
><br>
><br>
> Xiaolin<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> ??????????????????VIP???????????????????????????>><br>
><br>
> ??? 2015-02-17 21:41:22???"SIDERA Isabelle"<br>
> <<a href="mailto:isabelle.sidera@mae.u-paris10.fr">isabelle.sidera@mae.u-paris10.fr</a>> ?????????<br>
><br>
> Dear All,<br>
><br>
><br>
> May be I am not informed, but I did not hear anything related to the<br>
> publication of the proceedings of Zhengzhou. Can anybody give me news of<br>
> it ?<br>
> Thank you, Isabelle<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Isabelle SIDERA ??? Directrice de recherche au CNRS<br>
> Directrice de l'UMR 7055 Pr??histoire et Technologie<br>
><br>
> maison Arch??ologie & ethnologie, Ren??-Ginouv??s (MAE)<br>
> 21 All??e de l'Universit?? - 92 023 Nanterre cedex<br>
> tel. + 1 46 69 24 48<br>
> <a href="https://cnrs-gif.academia.edu/" target="_blank">https://cnrs-gif.academia.edu/</a><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Bonetools mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">Bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a><br>
> <a href="https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools" target="_blank">https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools</a><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bonetools mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">Bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a><br>
<a href="https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools" target="_blank">https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:08:16 +0100<br>
From: "cobecker" <<a href="mailto:cobecker@zedat.fu-berlin.de">cobecker@zedat.fu-berlin.de</a>><br>
To: 'R?mi BERTHON' <<a href="mailto:rberthon@yahoo.fr">rberthon@yahoo.fr</a>>, "'Mailing list for<br>
archaeologists of the research group for the study of object and waste<br>
of bone, antler. ivory and horn.'" <<a href="mailto:bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [Bonetools] Russian terminology<br>
Message-ID: <003e01d0502a$91f78270$b5e68750$@<a href="http://zedat.fu-berlin.de" target="_blank">zedat.fu-berlin.de</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
Dear R?mi! I asked one of my colleagues, specialised in Eurasian archaeology and perfect in the Russian language: prokolka = Knochenspitze, shilo = Pfriem. She could not tell me more specific meanings. Greetings Yours Cornelia<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Von: Bonetools [mailto:<a href="mailto:bonetools-bounces@listserv.niif.hu">bonetools-bounces@listserv.niif.hu</a>] Im Auftrag von R?mi BERTHON<br>
Gesendet: Freitag, 20. Februar 2015 15:16<br>
An: <a href="mailto:bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a><br>
Betreff: [Bonetools] Russian terminology<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Dear all,<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
I am translating a (Neolithic) archaeological report from Russian to English and I get some difficulties with two bone pointed tools-related terms: ???????? (prokolka) and ???? (shilo).<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
>From the text it seems that prokolka has (part of) the epiphysis left on at one end, whereas the shilo seems to have both ends sharpened. Should I use "awl" for both or do you have any suggestion for a differentiated translation ? (Unfortunately I don't have illustration of what is considered as prokolka or shilo in the text).<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Many thanks in advance<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
R?mi Berthon<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://listserv.niif.hu/pipermail/bonetools/attachments/20150224/19ff9da7/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://listserv.niif.hu/pipermail/bonetools/attachments/20150224/19ff9da7/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 3<br>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:13:22 +0000<br>
From: Nerissa Russell <<a href="mailto:nr29@cornell.edu">nr29@cornell.edu</a>><br>
To: "<a href="mailto:bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a>" <<a href="mailto:bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [Bonetools] Lepus and Bone Tools<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:D112381B.1C6DE%25nr29@cornell.edu">D112381B.1C6DE%nr29@cornell.edu</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
At ?atalh?y?k (Neolithic Turkey), they occasionally made simple beads from segments of hare long bones, judging from a radius and a humerus piece that remained as waste.<br>
<br>
Nerissa Russell<br>
Professor<br>
Department of Anthropology<br>
Cornell University<br>
607-255-6790<br>
<br>
<br>
From: Karin Scott <<a href="mailto:kayscott@mweb.co.za">kayscott@mweb.co.za</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:kayscott@mweb.co.za">kayscott@mweb.co.za</a>>><br>
Reply-To: "<a href="mailto:bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a>>" <<a href="mailto:bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a>>><br>
Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at 5:13 AM<br>
To: "<a href="mailto:bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a>>" <<a href="mailto:bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a>>><br>
Subject: [Bonetools] Lepus and Bone Tools<br>
<br>
Dear List<br>
<br>
Thank you to Alice for adding me.<br>
I am an Archaeozoologist based in South Africa. I am currently doing my Masters in comparative osteology and osteomorphology of the two hare species of southern Africa Lepus capensis (Cape hare) and Lepus saxatilis (scrub hare) .<br>
Hares remains are found on almost all archaeological faunal assemblages here although the NISP/MNI numbers vary greatly. As part of my osteology research I look at the archaeological and ethnological record to try and explain their presence on site. I found a very short note in an article that hare/rabbit bones were used by native Americans to make bone tools. It made me wonder if the same happened here with the hare bones. Hares were also used in traditional medicine and possibly for other items such as clothing.<br>
I would appreciate any references and/or articles that relate to the use of hares (whole, part, or bones) worldwide that can give me a starting point for investigations or speculations as to why they are always present on sites. That is, of course, in addition to forming part of the diet.<br>
I thank you in advance for your assistance.<br>
<br>
Kind regards<br>
<br>
Karin<br>
Never argue with a dragon<br>
For thou art crunchy<br>
and goes well with cheese<br>
<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://listserv.niif.hu/pipermail/bonetools/attachments/20150224/2ac3920f/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">https://listserv.niif.hu/pipermail/bonetools/attachments/20150224/2ac3920f/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 4<br>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:02:33 +0000<br>
From: "Griffitts, Janet L - (griffitt)" <<a href="mailto:griffitt@email.arizona.edu">griffitt@email.arizona.edu</a>><br>
To: "Mailing list for archaeologists of the research group for the<br>
study of object and waste of bone, antler. ivory and horn."<br>
<<a href="mailto:bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [Bonetools] Lepus and Bone Tools<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:27E20AA8B4ED1C42B1FCED562243E5297BCBBD33@Pirates.catnet.arizona.edu">27E20AA8B4ED1C42B1FCED562243E5297BCBBD33@Pirates.catnet.arizona.edu</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
In the southwestern US we find jackrabbit (Lepus sp.) bones made into awls, beads, tubes, tinklers (or what is interpretted as such), and occasionally other tools, ornaments, or other artifacts. In my limited experience it seems like there's a bit more variety in form in the Four Corners area (the Basketmaker, Anasazi/Ancestral Pueblo area) compared to Southern Arizona (Hohokam area), but that might be a matter of preservation and sample size. Here in the Sonora Desert, in the Hohokam area leporids tend to make up the majority of the faunal bone in archaeological sites so it isn't surprising that folks would have made tools from the rabbits and jackrabbits whenever it was practical. It isn't too uncommon to find that the only artiodactyl bone present will have been made into tools and usually artiodactyl bone is overrepresented in the bone tools compared to the overall faunal assemblage.<br>
<br>
Jackrabbit tools and ornaments are also present in the Plains, but as a generalization I don't think they usually make up as large a proportion in the overall bone artifact assemblage in the Plains as in the southwest, at least not in sites that have a lot of bison bone. That's a gross generalization and I'm sure there are a lot of exceptions, but this is my overall impression from working a bit in the 4 Corners, S. Arizona, and Plains.<br>
Hope this helps<br>
<br>
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++<br>
Jan Griffitts<br>
Visiting Scholar<br>
Dept. of Anthropology,<br>
Tucson,Arizona<br>
<br>
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++<br>
________________________________<br>
From: Bonetools [<a href="mailto:bonetools-bounces@listserv.niif.hu">bonetools-bounces@listserv.niif.hu</a>] on behalf of Karin Scott [<a href="mailto:kayscott@mweb.co.za">kayscott@mweb.co.za</a>]<br>
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 3:13 AM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a><br>
Subject: [Bonetools] Lepus and Bone Tools<br>
<br>
Dear List<br>
<br>
Thank you to Alice for adding me.<br>
I am an Archaeozoologist based in South Africa. I am currently doing my Masters in comparative osteology and osteomorphology of the two hare species of southern Africa Lepus capensis (Cape hare) and Lepus saxatilis (scrub hare) .<br>
Hares remains are found on almost all archaeological faunal assemblages here although the NISP/MNI numbers vary greatly. As part of my osteology research I look at the archaeological and ethnological record to try and explain their presence on site. I found a very short note in an article that hare/rabbit bones were used by native Americans to make bone tools. It made me wonder if the same happened here with the hare bones. Hares were also used in traditional medicine and possibly for other items such as clothing.<br>
I would appreciate any references and/or articles that relate to the use of hares (whole, part, or bones) worldwide that can give me a starting point for investigations or speculations as to why they are always present on sites. That is, of course, in addition to forming part of the diet.<br>
I thank you in advance for your assistance.<br>
<br>
Kind regards<br>
<br>
Karin<br>
Never argue with a dragon<br>
For thou art crunchy<br>
and goes well with cheese<br>
<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://listserv.niif.hu/pipermail/bonetools/attachments/20150224/8836a02f/attachment.html" target="_blank">https://listserv.niif.hu/pipermail/bonetools/attachments/20150224/8836a02f/attachment.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Subject: Digest Footer<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bonetools mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">Bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a><br>
<a href="https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools" target="_blank">https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools</a><br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
End of Bonetools Digest, Vol 107, Issue 16<br>
******************************************<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>