<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Dear Alice and everybody,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Don't forget to try any analysis possible on remains of brown-red material found on the tips of some Roman pins. Perhaps it will enable us to confirm or not
whether some "pins" were used as kohl sticks etc. I have tried to do it in the Weizmann Institute and failed to get any clear answer, but it was 10 years ago.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Etan<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Bonetools [mailto:bonetools-bounces@listserv.niif.hu]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Alice Choyke<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, May 09, 2014 8:07 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Mailing list for archaeologists of the research group for the study of object and waste of bone, antler. ivory and horn.<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Bonetools] Roman bone pin work waste<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear Stephen,<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Are you thinking about looking at those damned pins from the point of view of some sort of micro-use use wear analysis. I always found the typology of pins rather suspect as it seems to be rather rigid and does not look at the pins
as having any sort of active biography from selection of raw material (where available) manufacture, use, re-use, curation and discard stages.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Cheers!<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Alice<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 6:55 PM, <<a href="mailto:sjgreep@gmail.com" target="_blank">sjgreep@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Lena,<br>
<br>
I,ve a lot of information on British pin manufacturing sites, but from your post it looks like you have a great assemblage. As Ian Ridler notes I published a workshop from Canterbury a while ago (a mid fourth century deposit), but I have a lot more data.<br>
<br>
Most British evidence of pin manufacture comes from town sites, but there is some from rural sites - e.g. From the villa at Piddington) but most of this are isolated examples rather than complete workshop sequences.<br>
<br>
If you'd like some more information and help let me know and I will help as much as I can. I've records of around 10,000 British bone hair pins and am about to embark on a project looking in more detail at some assemblages, so I would be very interested in
hearing more about your finds in any case.<br>
<br>
I see others have sent you some useful publications which are all good. We don't (yet) have a comparable catalogue from a uk site, but my PhD (alas unpublished) has a very large body of material.<br>
<br>
Let me know if you'd like more detailed help - and I would be very interested from a personal point of view in any case<br>
<br>
Stephen Greep<br>
<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPad<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
> On 9 May 2014, at 13:44, Lena Strid <<a href="mailto:lena.strid@oxfordarch.co.uk">lena.strid@oxfordarch.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Dear all,<br>
><br>
> I have a very large Roman deposit of chopped up long bones from making bone pins. The bones are mostly cattle and horse metapodials, radius and tibia. The deposit is sampled entirely, sieved down to 4mm, and contains everything from large proximal and distal
ends down to broken-off hexagonal offcuts. It is a rural site, but very close to a Roman town in southern England.<br>
><br>
> Would any of you have any tips on the most useful way to record the deposit and/or a good reference material. I already know of Vine St (Leicester) and Sagalassos (Turkey). There is unlikely to be time for me to do a in-depth analysis of the bone working
procedure, but the assemblage would be retained for future research.<br>
><br>
> With thanks,<br>
> Lena<br>
> Files attached to this email may be in ISO 26300 format (OASIS Open Document Format). If you have difficulty opening them, please visit
<a href="http://iso26300.info" target="_blank">http://iso26300.info</a> for more information.<br>
><br>
> This email has been processed by SmoothZap - <a href="http://www.smoothwall.net" target="_blank">
www.smoothwall.net</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Bonetools mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">Bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a><br>
> <a href="https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools" target="_blank">https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bonetools mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">Bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a><br>
<a href="https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools" target="_blank">https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
<br>
<br>
************************************************************************************<br>
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by<br>
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.<br>
************************************************************************************<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>