<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
In the mean time, I searched help to enlarge the first picture ? On
my screan, the two spheres are even smaller than cherries...<br>
<br>
Now, bone is clear.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Le 08/01/2014 00:47, SA O'Connor a écrit :
<blockquote
cite="mid:20140107234704.14004tb6j7f726uc@webmail.brad.ac.uk"
type="cite">Dear Fiona,
<br>
<br>
Thank you for the additional images. The visible features confirm
that the object is bone, most probably turned from a thick strip
of a large mammal longbone.
<br>
<br>
I have attached the two most diagnostic pictures. The whole bead
shows the axially oriented, regularly spaced lines of dark spots
and dashes formed by the vascular system of the bone. Your
photomicrograph clearly shows a branching blood vessel in the
bone.
<br>
<br>
I have some experience turning lace bobbins in bone and I think
this 'dumbbell' bead may not be a single complete bead but two
unfinished beads.
<br>
<br>
To make these beads you start with a length of compact bone tissue
that is drilled down the centre. Several beads are turned along
the bone strip in one go but are left attached to each other. When
the shaping is complete the bone strip is removed from the lathe
and only then is a cut made between the beads to separate them.
If you try to part the beads whilst they are turning on the lathe
they will fly off in all directions when the chisel cuts through
to the drilled hole!
<br>
<br>
If you look at the waist between the beads you will see that one
side is vertical and the other sloped and marked with a dee</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:20140107234704.14004tb6j7f726uc@webmail.brad.ac.uk"
type="cite">p groove. These features ensure that the beads are cut
apart accurately. Either these beads were dropped before they
could be separated or they were discarded because they were
sub-standard. Perhaps some of the visible surface blemishes were
apparent when the bone was fresh.
<br>
<br>
Could they be Rosary beads?
<br>
<br>
All the best,
<br>
<br>
Sonia
<br>
<br>
Quoting fiona beglane <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:fionabeglane@yahoo.com"><fionabeglane@yahoo.com></a>:
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">See the attached image. I have this
double bead which seems to be made of ivory. It was found on a
medieval and post medieval site in Ireland. L=10.14mm,
dia=5.55mm and is perforated. I know that double beads have
been found in early medieval sites in Ireland - usually made of
glass. Does anyone know of any other bone or ivory examples
from Ireland or elsewhere?
<br>
Thank you all
<br>
<br>
Fiona
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------
<br>
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Bonetools mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Bonetools@listserv.niif.hu">Bonetools@listserv.niif.hu</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools">https://listserv.niif.hu/mailman/listinfo/bonetools</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
François POPLIN
Directeur honoraire de l’UMR 7209 Archéozoologie, Archébotanique : sociétés, pratiques et environnements
Responsable du Séminaire d'Anthropozoologie
Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle
CP 56
Ancien Laboratoire d’Anatomie comparée
55, rue de Buffon
75005 Paris
01 40 79 33 11
fax ------ 33 14
francoispoplin.blogspot.com
</pre>
</body>
</html>