[Bonetools] Re : Fwd: [ZOOARCH] proposed SAA interest group seeking signatures

Jean-Marc Petillon petillon at univ-tlse2.fr
Tue Jan 10 17:45:41 CET 2012


Dear all,

I hope I did not sound aggressive towards the SAA, I was more perplexed 
than anything else, and I am actually happy if this rather clumsy 
message of mine led to an interesting discussion in the end. Being an 
European, I did not see eurocentrism as particularly problematic in the 
first place ;-) but your points of view are very sound and enlightening, 
thanks for that!

Jean-Marc


Le 10/01/12 15:50, Christian Gates a écrit :
> Hello everyone,
>
> If I may share my point of view on this matter, I would like to
> underline the fact that most members of the WBRG are based in Europe,
> with meetings held in Europe. Unfortunately, many North American
> archaeologists sometimes have the tendency to look for collaboration
> with their North American collegues before looking at the international
> level, for various reasons (language, large basin of archaeologists in
> the USA, etc.). Thus, I think a working group among the Society for
> American Archaeology (SAA, perhaps the largest association of
> archaeologists in the world) cannot be a bad thing. The more working
> groups there are, the more worked bone studies will be known. It is not
> only a question of networking, but also a question of visibility and
> vitality. A multiplication of working groups would only mean that our
> field is alive and growing.
>
> Eva David mentions the 2004 symposium in Montreal, held during the
> annual SAA meeting. This is a symposium I organised with my collegue
> Renee Walker. At that time I was a postdoc fellow in the United States
> doing use wear analysis on bone tools. This was a new field to me (I
> have been trained as a ceramic specialist), and I had never met any
> other worked bone specialist before. It is only after this meeting that
> I joined the ICAZ and the WBRG. I'm saying this because I think it might
> happen again (with other young North American researchers especially).
> For example, If a worked bone working group in North America could do
> the same great work that is being done in Europe with the ICAZ-WBRG, I
> think that could only be a good thing. And I do not see these a
> "competing" working groups, but as different working groups on different
> continents working together, not against each other.
>
> Accordingly, I hope that a new worked bone working group will appear
> among the various SAA working groups. This will show to North American
> students and professors that it is an active field of research, and a
> further step in promoting the inclusion of work bone studies in the
> university curricula and in promoting the training of MA and PhD
> students in this field of research. Perhaps this could be a first step
> in having as many worked bone specialists in North America as there are
> in Europe (please, let me dream!!).
>
> I may be wrong, but this is how I see it. Sorry for this long message,
> and do not hesitate to share your comments on it.
>
> Have a nice day!
>
>
> Christian Gates St-Pierre
>
> Invited researcher
> Département d'anthropologie
> Université de Montréal
>
> Lecturer and posdoctoral research fellow
> Département d'histoire
> Université Laval
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *De :* Eva David <eva.david at mae.u-paris10.fr>
> *À :* "Mailing list for archaeologists of the research group for the
> study of object and waste of bone, antler. ivory and horn."
> <bonetools at listserv.niif.hu>
> *Envoyé le :* Mardi 10 Janvier 2012 4h56
> *Objet :* Re: [Bonetools] Fwd: [ZOOARCH] proposed SAA interest group
> seeking signatures
>
> Short Note :
> WBRG Members have already participated to SAA (Montréal, 2004) for a
> special dedicated session on Bone technology, but of course, they 're
> not there representative of WBRG's then :
> Ch. Gates St.-Pierre & R. Walker (Eds.), 2007, /Bones as Tools; Current
> methods and interpretations in worked bone studies/. Oxford (/BAR
> International Series/; 1622).
> Best, éva
>
>
> Le 9 janv. 2012 à 19:50, Alice Choyke a écrit :
>
>> Dear Jean-Marc,
>> I agree with you about possible duplication but it is also precisely
>> the reason that WBRG must be truly international and not expect the
>> world to come to us! I can perfectly understand that colleagues in the
>> US, Asia and the Pacific feel frustrated that all our meetings have
>> been uniformly in Europe. We should have pressed for more
>> international venues much earlier than Salzburg but, frankly, it never
>> occurred to me.
>> Cheers,
>> Alice
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Jean-Marc Petillon
>> <petillon at univ-tlse2.fr <mailto:petillon at univ-tlse2.fr>> wrote:
>>
>>     It's good news to see that interest for bone technology is on the
>>     rise in the SAA as well, but what will be the purpose of this
>>     group except duplicating what the WBRG is already doing?
>>
>>
>>
>>     Le 06/01/12 11:56, Christian Küchelmann a écrit :
>>
>>
>>         Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
>>
>>             Von: Sarah Whitcher Kansa <skansa at ALEXANDRIAARCHIVE.ORG
>>             <mailto:skansa at ALEXANDRIAARCHIVE.ORG>>
>>             Datum: 5. Januar 2012 20:24:51 MEZ
>>             An: ZOOARCH at JISCMAIL.AC.UK <mailto:ZOOARCH at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
>>             Betreff: [ZOOARCH] proposed SAA interest group seeking
>>             signatures
>>             Antwort an: Sarah Whitcher Kansa
>>             <skansa at ALEXANDRIAARCHIVE.ORG
>>             <mailto:skansa at ALEXANDRIAARCHIVE.ORG>>
>>
>>             Dear all,
>>
>>             A zooarchaeologist colleague, Lisa Dugas, is putting
>>             together a
>>             proposal for a new Zooarchaeology and Bone Technology
>>             Interest Group
>>             (ZBTIG) for the Society for American Archaeology. She is
>>             soliciting
>>             signatures from colleagues who are SAA members and who
>>             would be
>>             interested in participating in this working group. It will
>>             be a free
>>             group that will meet once a year at the SAA meeting to
>>             exchange
>>             information about zooarchaeology and bone technology
>>             research and issues.
>>
>>             Lisa has provided a simple form to sign that says you are
>>             an SAA
>>             member and plan to participate in the group. I've put the
>>             form online
>>             at the link below (Word doc) If you're at all interested,
>>             please sign
>>             it and send it to Lisa.
>>             http://alexandriaarchive.org/__bonecommons/items/show/1819
>>             <http://alexandriaarchive.org/bonecommons/items/show/1819>
>>
>>
>>             (Zooarchaeology and Bone Technology Interest Group single
>>             signature
>>             form.doc)
>>
>>             If you'd like more information about the proposed group,
>>             please email
>>             Lisa: l.dugas at gaiconsultants.com
>>             <mailto:l.dugas at gaiconsultants.com>
>>
>>             Thanks for your help!
>>             Sarah
>>
>>
>>             -- Sarah Whitcher Kansa Executive Director,



-- 
Jean-Marc Petillon
CNRS
Laboratoire TRACES - travaux et recherches archeologiques
sur les cultures, les espaces et les societes

Universite Toulouse le Mirail
Maison de la recherche
5 allees A. Machado
F-31058 Toulouse

+ 33 (0) 5 61 50 23 63
+ 33 (0) 6 31 07 47 62

Page personnelle : 
http://traces.univ-tlse2.fr/1255444693711/0/fiche___annuaireksup/&RH=annuaire_traces




More information about the Bonetools mailing list