[Bonetools] Fwd: request bonetool list

[Alice Choyke]

Dear colleagues,
        Herbert seems to be having trouble with his account so I am posting
the second group of images to all yof you.

Best,
Alice

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Herbert Boehm <a9504315 at unet.univie.ac.at>
Date: Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:11 AM
Subject: Re: request bonetool list
To: Alice Choyke <choyke at ceu.hu>
Cc: a9504315 at unet.univie.ac.at


dear alice,
i don´t know if the second mail with picture 3 and 4 is "on air"- i tried
to post them again this afternoon from karl kunst´s account but don´t know
if it worked...
if it did not -could you post them-since there were people asking about
it...
sorry again for all the problems..
herbert


On Mi, 25.11.2009, 14:04, Alice Choyke wrote:
> Dear Herbert,
>      Ours isnot to reason why... just be glad it worked this time!
>
> A.
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Herbert Boehm
> <a9504315 at unet.univie.ac.at>wrote:
>
>> dear alice,
>> i tried to post a request on the bonetool-mailing-list for several times
>> during the last two days but it never worked-i just don´t know why... i
>> tried: bonetools at listserv.niif.hu and bonetools at listserv.iif.hu (these
>> are
>> the two adresses i have-which one is correct?)
>> am i doing something wrong?-maybe i´m just too dull...
>> i´m sorry but now i try it the (un)direct way to an adress of you which
>> i
>> found in one of your mails to the list.
>> the request is right below-i hope i don´t bother you too much but i
>> don´t
>> know what else i can do.
>> there are also some pictures attached...
>> alle the best
>> herbert
>>
>>
>>
>> dear all,
>> does anyone know such antler-artifacts? -it was excavated from an early
>> iron age settlement in lower austria. For me, it looks like a part of a
>> more complex composite tool.
>> it´s probably made of a brow tine or bay tine and the surface was
>> carefully carved so the original pearled surface was completely removed.
>> the tip seems to be slightly polished and rounded but doesn´t show signs
>> of heavy use so i believe the main thing to reconstruct the function is
>> the transverse notch carved out on the opposite end of the tool.
>> Unfortunately, there is for sure a part missing at this area because the
>> "gap" you see (e.g. picture 3)seems to be the result of at least one
>> modern and probably another "antique" crack. as you can see on picture 2
>> and 4 there was obviously no "functional" hole worked in the spongy
>> part-maybe just a slight groove was carved in.
>> i´m grateful about any comments...
>> all the best
>> herbert
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://listserv.niif.hu/pipermail/bonetools/attachments/20091126/ed449ddf/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pic3.jpg
Type: image/pjpeg
Size: 230503 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://listserv.niif.hu/pipermail/bonetools/attachments/20091126/ed449ddf/attachment-0002.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pic4.jpg
Type: image/pjpeg
Size: 207821 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://listserv.niif.hu/pipermail/bonetools/attachments/20091126/ed449ddf/attachment-0003.bin>